Earth Science March
13, 2014
Current Event Jillian
Jiampietro
Take
a Breath and Thank a Sponge
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/science/take-a-breath-and-thank-a-sponge.html?src=me&_r=2
The article I decided to analyze was entitled, Take a Breath and Thank a Sponge, written
by Carl Zimmer. Before I read this article, I thought of sponges as just a
species that lived its life on the sea floor trapping bits of food, yet this
article proves to me that sponges had a crucial role in the development of all
species on Earth and the rise of the Animal Kingdom.
Dr. Lenton,
an earth systems scientist at the University of Exeter, was the one who first
formed the hypothesis that sponges played a very important role in the
evolution of all species. Dr. Lenton and his colleagues believe that over 700
million years ago, sponges transformed the planet by releasing a mass amount of
oxygen into the ocean. Before this great unleash of oxygen, there was barely
any oxygen in the Earth’s atmosphere and almost none in the ocean as well. A
man named Donald E. Canfield decided to run an experiment to see how little
oxygen sponges need to survive. His results stated that sponges could handle
surviving with 17 percent oxygen in the atmosphere, which is about 4 percent
less than the average level. Dr. Canfield’s data proves that sponges could have
evolved many years before oxygen levels were even close to a comfortable level.
More evidence that proves this hypothesis is that scientist found fossils and
chemical traces of sponges that date back as far as 700 million years, which is
way before the ocean gained much of its oxygen. Even though the evidence
proving Dr. Lenton’s theory is plentiful, there were theories formed before
that argued against Dr. Lenton’s theory. This important past hypothesis was
made by John Ralph Nursall in 1959. Dr. Nursall’s hypothesis stated that the
evolution of animals had been blocked because Earth had to accumulate enough
oxygen to support them. This argument was based on the fact that living animals
consume lots of oxygen to run their bodies. Yet his hypothesis that animal
could not evolve on low oxygen Earth has been challenged by recent studies,
including Dr. Canfield’s study. Dr. Canfield was a big supporter of Lenton’s
hypothesis, saying that Dr. Lenton’s paper correctly explained the evidence
scientists have gathered so far about the history of animals and ocean. Yet Dr.
Lenton's theory goes even deeper into the idea that not only did sponges exist
at low level’s of oxygen, but that the first animals themselves were
responsible for raising the levels of oxygen in the ocean, which caused more
complex life to be formed. For instance, billions of years ago the ocean’s
surface was covered in photosynthetic bacteria, yet this bacteria was eaten by
predatory microbes that caused the ocean to remain oxygen free. Yet later this
changed with algae and other large single celled organisms began to evolve.
When the algae and single celled organism got bigger and died, they would sink
deep into the ocean. Then down at the bottom of the sea would be the sponges
that acted as seawater filters that trapped organic matter and lowered
nutrients in the water like phosphorus. Since sponges consumes the phosphorus,
their would be none for the bacteria to go through photosynthesis, allowing
algae to gain more oxygen which it then would produce into the deep levels of
the ocean. Sponges are what made a new environment with an oxygen rich ocean
and new animals possible, and with new animals forming meant more ways for
oxygen to be formed and so on. These detailed hypothesis created by scientists
are believed to be only a few of the crazy ideas that are going to be thrown
our way about the interesting history of oxygen and animals.
This
article connects to society today because without the transformation of the
level of oxygen, we might not be alive today. These theories gathered on what
sponges might have done to start the Animal Kingdom is what makes all different
species and the different theories on how life began so interesting. As stated
my Dr. Lenton in this article, “This story is about the first animals
bootstrapping the environment into one where more complex animals could evolve.
This is essentially the birth of the modern world.”
I found
this article to be fascinating because it is proving that a brainless species
could have played a crucial role in the forming of human kind and all the
species before us that rely on oxygen. I found it confusing on what Dr.
Lenton’s actual hypothesis was in some areas of the article since there were many
different factors to what he was trying to prove so I think it would have been
a good idea to specify what Dr. Lenton actual hypothesis was. Yet, I still
found that it gave great information for both sides of this ongoing argument on
whether animals, like sponges, could live in low levels of oxygen and if they
did actually have an important part in raising the oxygen levels on earth.
You did a great job of presenting this article. Using evidence from your article, you supported that sponges were key to creation our modern atmosphere, and the rise of life on Earth. The facts were well suited to, and connected clearly to the point. You also picked an article which hardly could be more important and pointed that out clearly in your third paragraph. Life as we know it could not survive without an oxygenated atmosphere. Finally, your short introduction provided a good reference to the article, and shared your thoughts. I now believe that an introduction should be written to all current events.
ReplyDeleteBefore reading this article, I knew nearly nothing of the Precambrian Era, and I still only know a little. However, I was amazed that life grow in competing plant and animal phases. As bigger, more complex animals or plants evolved, they produced more oxygen or carbon dioxide and allowed their opposites to advance even more. Also although I knew sponges are important to marine biodiversity, I had no idea they were important to early life or that they are few hundred million years old. It seems sponges have been important life forms right from the beginning.
My criticism of this report is that the third paragraph could have been expanded on. It seems as though the writer wrote too much in his second paragraph and tried to shorten his third to make up. As a result, the report is not well connected to world at large. However, the report was well written and the extra length of the second paragraph somewhat makes up for the third.
First of all, I really liked that you summarized your previous knowledge about sponges in comparison to what you have learned in a brief introductory paragraph. That really had me asking myself what I knew about sponges and their significance on Earth. Furthermore, your summary paragraph is well written and very informative. I think it is really important that you included the counter arguments and counter studies to Dr. Lenton’s research. Not only did you do a good job explaining the reasons for different theories, but also you did a nice job describing how different organisms and species have contributed to Earth’s oxygen levels over a period of billions of years.
ReplyDeleteBefore reading your report, I would have never suspected that sponges, brainless creatures, have played a crucial role in the development of the Earth and life on Earth. I thought the process of algae, or any other single celled organism, dying and sinking to the ocean floor to be filtered by the sponges was fascinating. I did not know that such an interesting process was what furthered the life of new animals and more oxygen on earth. It is also incredible to think that billions of years ago, this planet, including the ocean, had very little oxygen whatsoever. Therefore, it is really cool to learn that sponges need four percent less oxygen than the average species.
The one suggestion I could make about your report would be to stay consistent with the scientist or researcher you are talking about. Throughout your summary paragraph you began talking about one scientist, started talking about another, and then went back to talking about the first one. It got a little bit confusing, but besides that, you did a really nice job. You really chose an interesting topic!
Jillian,
ReplyDeleteI thought you did a great job with your current event because you made your introduction very personable, you body paragraph very factual, and your concluding paragraph very understandable. YOur summary on Dr. Lenton's research was easy to follow, but at the same time very scientific. For those of us who find science to be challenging, you made it easy to understand exactly what your article was trying to get across.
Also, you added necessary analysis of what your opinion on the topic was. It was great to read about the evolution of the human/animal species because of oxygen levels and also it gave me a much greater understanding of what sea sponges really are and what they do. I would agree with Natalia's comment on picking anther scientist, but I would like to add that I would have liked you to expand using other research even thought the assignment does not require you to do so. This was a really great article to choose and I am happy I got to read your take on it. Next time in class, we can have this discussion on how sponges impact us!
ReplyDeleteYour summary and paragraph was strong. I would have broken up the summary paragraph though into more than on paragraph because it was so long.
I thought your conclusion/critique was a little weak. You said you didn't understand Dr. Lenton's actual hypothesis, but I think you did! You summarized it well in your report. Sometimes a hypothesis is complex and not a straightforward one-sentence explanation. Dr. Lenton's theory of animal evolution includes several different parts, which you summarized well.