Saturday, October 26, 2013

A Quiet Trip to the Ozone Hole

Earth Science                                                                                                 Andrew Harwood
Current Event Report                                                                                   10/26/13

            Citation:

Wald, Matthew L. "A Quiet Trip to the Ozone Hole." The New York Times. N.p., 21 Oct. 2013. Web.

            The stratosphere is 15 miles above the Polar Regions, nearing outer space. This is where human made chemicals are constantly tearing apart our ozone layer that protects us from the extremely harmful UV rays emitted by the Sun. Scientists have always wanted to study this layer closely but have never been able to due to the technology that surrounds us. Besides, conventional airplanes only fly to 30,000 feet. Einar K. Enevoldson (81) came up with a new way to fly to these literally breathtaking heights. Dennis Tito and Steve Fossett, two men that will help Einar through this journey say that a glider will do the trick. Without the weight of engines or fuel, a glider can be lifted by natural atmospheric phenomena. The glider, named the Perlan project will have an 82-foot wingspan and only weigh 1700 pounds, including body weight. One of the most controversial topics talked about of the flight is that how are they going to breathe? Perlan I was a hundred pounds heavier and only got to about 50,000 feet. However, the men in Perlan I used pressurized suits, but Einar says that there will be no room for that in Perlan II. “The solution is to seal the tiny cabin as the plane ascends, and bleed off a little air through a valve so the cabin pressure mimics what it would be at 14,500 feet. The sealed cabin needs spaceship-style scrubbers to remove the carbon dioxide and the moisture that would otherwise produce ice on the windows and walls. There is no way to warm the plane — another consequence of lacking an engine — so the two pilots, who will spell each other during the long flight, will wear socks with heaters in their soles, Einar said.” With that set and done the two men will travel to the Andes Mountain range in El Calafate, Argentina. They plain will then be lifted by a, “crop duster” which will lift the to 10,000 feet. After that the glider, with only the assistance of the tornado-like winds will be lifted to their final destination of 90,000 feet. When they finally reach such a height, after more than four hours, the men will take samples using lasers to observe and measure concentrations of liquids. They will cruise at this height for a few hours and then practically nose dive back to Earth. They will than open the parachute in the tail, slowing them down and landing safely on the soil. If all goes well they will not only obliterate the record and hopefully come back with some data that can help us humans protect our much-needed ozone layer.

            This was is one of the most interesting articles I have ever read. This is so cool to even think that on can fly over 90,000 feet above sea level. It is yet another aspect of Earth Science that I truly cannot comprehend by just seeing the numbers. It is mind-blowing information and I am fortunate today to have the technology we have to conduct such a traitorous flight. The full fiberglass frame of the glider is hand polished and it the circular shaped windows are in place to keep the frame from breaking. If this actually works, we could be talking about a new breakthrough in science. We can possibly find a cure to the ozone problem. We could save the human race.

            Matthew Wald does a great job at really dragging the reader in. Who doesn’t want to learn about a plain with no engines reaching altitudes of 90,000 feet? That is truly mind-blowing. He does a great job on the facts and I like how he corrects one of his peers by stating how his facts were wrong. I can really comprehend this article and I even know the little details, like the professors that are critiquing Einar’s plan the only negative about this article is the length. I think it is about 30 paragraphs. Although the paragraphs were only about 10 lines long, I felt as though I was reading the article for a good forty-five minutes. In all, I really enjoyed this project.

           



2 comments:

  1. This article sounds fascinating. I really enjoyed how you explained all of the factors that would affect the men. You also included a lot of interesting facts. I agree that these numbers are unfathomable. I like how you used an alliteration ("full fiberglass frame"). I think you did a great job of making this topic very interesting. Honestly, when I first started reading, I wasn’t immediately hooked. However, when I read on, I became very interested. Ultimately, your review is very well done, enjoyable, and informative.
    I was very impressed to learn that the glider can be lifted by natural atmospheric phenomena; especially considering the glider will be lifted to over 90,000 feet above the sea level. I also was impressed that there will be no heater due to the lacking engine. It is interesting to think that socks with heaters will keep the pilots warm enough when they are that high above sea level. I was also impressed that it will only take them four hours to reach their destination and that they would be spending a few hours at this destination. Also, it is scary to think that they will essentially nose dive back to Earth.
    I don’t think there is much you need to improve on. I think the beginning needed some sort of hook. Also, I think you should include information about when they will be planning on completing this journey. Other than that, your review was very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There were many aspects of your review that were very well written. For example, the statistics that you included really helped convey the message of how exciting this event is. These details helped reel me in and kept the review interesting. Another aspect of the review that I liked was the use of vocabulary. Like Ally said, the figurative language made it a great read. Also, phrases and words such as “breathtaking”, “natural atmospheric phenomena”, “obliterated”, and “mind-blowing” made your review really pop. Another aspect of your review that I liked was how you appealed to the reader’s emotions. You made the reader believe that if this mission doesn’t occur then the human race will be destroyed. This was a useful tactic in getting the reader to side with your argument. Finally, the way you were able to explain certain ideas and topics helped me imagine them and made them seem less confusing. Overall, your review was informative and exciting.
    Like Ally, the article you chose hooked me in because I had never heard of this mission before. Since, I hadn’t heard about Perlan II, I was shocked to hear that scientists were trying to reach 90,000 feet. Another thing that amazed me even more was that they were doing this without an engine. I will make sure to continue to follow up on this topic and am excited to hear the result.
    Andrew, you did a great job on this review. I wish you had gone into more depth into what scientists are looking to learn from this mission. Why is this so important and how are we going to solve the problem? Besides that and some grammatical errors, your review was fascinating.

    ReplyDelete