Devin Portner 10/2/15
Earth Science Current
Event #1
Chang, Kenneth.
"Mars Shows Signs of Having Flowing Water, Possible Niches for Life,
NASA
Says." The New York Times. The New York Times, 28 Sept. 2015. Web.
02 Oct. 2015. <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/29/science/space/mars-life-liquid-water.html>.
Mars Shows Signs of
Having Flowing Water, Possible Niches for Life, NASA Says
Recently,
scientists have found liquid water flowing on the surface of Mars, which may
suggest that there is some sort of life.
Nobody has ever been able to prove that life exists beyond Earth, but
now, scientists are well on their way to finding other living organisms. It is expected that in 2020, scientists will
send a probe to specifically search for life on the empty planet, which will
most likely be a high priority at the time.
Billions of years ago, Mars had large bodies of water including rivers
and even oceans. Nowadays, the planet is
dusty and there are only a few small sections of moist soil. Perchlorates, a type of salt identified had
to have liquid water to form, which proves that there is water on Mars. Within the frozen solid ice caps, there have
been hints of melting water but there is not enough evidence to consider the
idea that there is water on Mars a proven fact.
In photographs from an orbiter from 2011, Dr. McEwen and his colleagues
discovered vertical lines along canyons, mountains and craters where the
streaks faded as temperatures dropped and grew darker and longer during the
summer. Water may be the reason these changes occur in the lines. As stated in the article, these differences
in the lines are “similar to the way concrete darkens when wet and returns to
its original color when dry.” These
lines have been named the recurring slope lineae, or R.S.L.s. During the period of the R.S.L. where the
line fades, the levels of salt at the locations help indicate that there is
some sort of liquid water. Although we
have some evidence to prove scientist’s theories that there is water on Mars,
we don’t know where it is coming from.
One suggestion is that Mars is sucking in moisture, which means the
lower part of the atmosphere may have a higher humidity that we originally
thoughts. Some believe that even though
there may be liquid on Mars, that does not technically mean there is life
because the water may be too salty for living organisms to survive there. Many
scientists have conflicting views as to whether or not this theory is
true. We have to wait until 2020 to
launch the probe because scientists are worries that Earth will contaminate
Mars with its organisms so there has to be a sterilizing process beforehand
which takes a lot of time and money to do.
Scientists also have to figure out where it can be habitable and not melt
too fast in order for it to gather a substantial amount of information. One rover is already on Mars exploring the
Gale Crater and there is a possibility of a detour but that would have to be
discussed and debated first.
Proof from a
rover that there is water and life on Mars would greatly affect humans
today. If life is found in the future,
that means that Mars is habitable and possibly suitable for other life forms as
well. New species might be discovered
and evidence may be gathered on how water is present on Mars. Discoveries about Mars may help us to find
new things out about Earth and our atmosphere as well. For example, one theory that is yet to be
proven is that we think the atmosphere is at a higher temperature than it is
actually at. If we gather evidence on
how water is collected on the planet, we might gather evidence on the
temperature of our atmosphere as well.
It would be a huge discovery if life were found on Mars because it would
be the first planet in our solar system as well as in the universe we have
found life on and it would give people hope that there is more life out there
and other habitable places.
Overall, this
article was informative about the possible new discovery of water and life on
Mars. I liked how the author laid out
the article, first giving previous characteristics about Mars, then current
findings, and finally possibilities for the future however there were a few
factors I would change. One way I think
this article could have been improved is by giving more background information
on Mars. I would like to know more about
what it was like millions of years ago, how it lost its water, etc. Another way
Chang could have improved the article is by giving more information about what
kinds of life scientists might expect to find and how long the data will take
to collect once the robot is actually sent if it happens to go and how it will
be sent. In general, this article gave a
lot of information on the new findings and future ideas for the newfound water
and possible life on Mars.
Devin did a very nice job with her current events report. This has been one of the very big latests discoveries by NASA so I enjoyed reading her report of the article and how it may impact our lives in the future. What I really liked about her report was how she explained the definition of the words. Many times during a summary of an article, the writer does not bother to explain the meaning of a word and assumes that the reader already knows what it means. In this case, I did not know what Perchlorates were. Thanks to Devin, I now know that they are "a type of salt identified had to have liquid water to form". Defining words in a report is important. It allows the reader to understand the article that they are reporting on as well as the sentence that they are writing. A second aspect of her review that I thought was very good was her explanation on how Mars was a billion years ago and compared it to what it looks like now. From her report I was able to learn that at one time, Mars was a planet that once oceans and rivers just like Earth. This is proof that there once was life on Mars. Devin was able to explain, in a good way, the difference between Mars now (pretty much made up of dust) and what it was like then (similar water systems than Earth like rivers and oceans) which was able to give a sort of view to the reader on how Mars changed. A third aspect of her review that I thought was particularly well presented was how she explained that water may not equal life. From what she said, I was able to understand that just because there was water on Mars and water had been discovered, it does not mean that there will be life on Mars. Since she mentioned it in her review, that seems to be something that people confuse when studying Mars. The water could have had nutrients in it that could not support a living species.
ReplyDeleteTwo things that I found particularly interesting in her article are how Mars once had water billions of years ago and why they have to wait until 2020 before sending a probe out to Mars. When looking at a picture of Mars today, I never would have ever thought that it was possible for it to have water. Mars looks like a dry planet made up of sand and dust with no possibility of life on it. But it does have water which really surprised me. Like Devin explained in the article, Mars is like concrete. It soaks up the water and then the planet goes back to it's original state when dry. I also found it interesting that they have to wait till 2020 until a probe can be sent out. "Scientists are worries that Earth will contaminate Mars with its organisms so there has to be a sterilizing process beforehand which takes a lot of time and money to do." (Devin states in her summary of the article). It's good that scientists are not going to do whatever they want but they are also aware of how their missions could affect their surroundings.
Overall I thought that Devin did a really nice job with her report so there isn't much to judge but if there was something she could have included, it would be a quote from someone who is researching this discovery. It would have been interesting to use a reliable source to understand even more about the subject. Good Job Devin!