Noor Banihashem Ahmad September,
2012
Earth Science Current
Event
Sept.
5, 2012 — A new study of deep-sea life across the globe aims to understand how
natural gradients in food and temperature in the dark, frigid waters of the
deep sea affect the snails, clams, and other creatures that live there.
Similar studies have been
conducted for animals in the shallow oceans, but our understanding of the
impact of food and temperature on life in the deep sea — the Earth's largest
and most remote ecosystem — has been more limited.
The results will help
scientists understand what to expect in the deep sea under future climate
change, the researchers say.
"Our findings indicate that the deep sea,
once thought remote and buffered against climatic change, may function quite
differently in the future," they write.
All living things need energy
in the form of food, heat and light to survive, grow, and reproduce. But for
life in the deep sea — defined as anything beyond 600 feet (200 m) — energy of
any kind is in short supply. Descend more than a few hundred feet beneath the
ocean surface, and you'll find a blue-black world of near-freezing temperatures,
and little or no light.
Because so little of the
sun's light penetrates the surface waters, there are no plants for animals to
eat. Most deep-sea animals feed on tiny particles of dead and decaying organic
matter drifting down from the sunlit waters above. It is estimated that less
than 1% of the food at the surface reaches the ocean's watery depths.
The researchers wanted to
know what this energy deprivation means for deep sea habitats across the globe,
and for the animals that live there. "How much of the differences that we
see across different groups of deep-sea animals in terms of growth, or
lifespan, or the number of species, are related to differences in the
temperature or amount of food where they occur?" said co-author Craig
McClain of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, North
Carolina.
To find out, the researchers
compiled previously published data for hundreds of different deep-sea organisms
across the globe, ranging from crabs and snails, to fish and tube worms. The
data included parameters like metabolic rate, lifespan, growth, biomass,
abundance, size and diversity.
The results suggest that the
relative importance of the two basic forms of energy available in the deep sea
— food and warmth — vary considerably, said co-author Michael Rex at the
University of Massachusetts in Boston.
Temperature has the biggest
impact on parameters at the individual level, such as metabolism and growth
rate. For example, deep sea animals living in warmer waters tend to have faster
metabolisms.
But for higher-level
parameters such as abundance or biodiversity, food is more important. Generally
speaking, food-rich areas tend to have animals that are bigger, more abundant
and more diverse.
The results add to the
growing body of evidence that the deep sea isn't isolated from the effects of
climate change, the researchers say.
"The oceans are getting
warmer and they're producing less food," McClain said. Warmer water in the
deep sea due to climate change could mean faster growth and metabolism for the
animals that live there, but that could be bad news if the oceans produce less
food to support them.
"The
news is not good," Rex added. "Changes in temperature and food
availability associated with climate change could cause widespread extinction
in the deep ocean if environmental changes occur faster than deep-sea organisms
can respond by shifting their ranges or adapting to new conditions."
CITATION:
McClain, C., A. Allen, et al. (2012). "The energetics of life on the deep
sea floor." PNAS. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208976109
Deep Sea Life: Threatened By Global
Warming
Response:
This article is primarily talking about how the
creatures at the bottom of the ocean are not getting enough food that they need
to survive. The Earth’s largest ecosystem has had limited food and near
freezing temperatures. These creatures such as: snails, brittle stars, sea pen,
sea cucumber, claims and other assorted invertebrates, do not have the
necessary nutrients that they need to survive. The sun’s rays are not strong
enough to heat the bottoms of the ocean, and on top of that, these animals only
receive one percent of the food that is at the surface. As you can see, there
resources are very limited. Researchers have recently done tests to see what
this lack of energy means for the deep-sea habitats across the world.
Researchers at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, North
Carolina have tested on many snails, cabs, and tubeworms. They checked the
things like metabolic rate, lifespan, growth, biomass, size, and biomass. The
bottom line is that the oceans are heating up, and there is less food out
there. This could be good news in the sense that it is warming up, but it is
also bad if less food is being produced. In conclusion, the news is not the
best. Due to the changes in temperature and obtainability to food associated
with climate change could cause an extinction in deep-sea creatures if they do
no react fast enough to the changes conditions. These organisms have little
food, and the temperatures down at the bottom of the ocean are getting warmer.
Warmer water causes organisms to have faster metabolisms. Food is not being produced
as much anymore, and a faster metabolism means that these creatures will get
hungry faster. The problem would be that there would be no food to eat.
This
tragedy could affect a lot of creatures in the sea. If these deep-sea organisms
go extinct, then a food source could be wiped out for some of the other
creatures. I’m sure that snails, crabs, and claims are a food source to another
creature in the sea. If these animals go extinct, then another creature might
not get the nutrients that it needs. If this creature doesn’t get the nutrients
that it needs, it could go extinct as well. It could even set off a chain
reaction. Our whole sea life has the potential to be completely wiped out. If
these deep-sea animals go extinct, we might lose our access to crab, claims,
and other deep-sea creatures that we eat too. This would be very sad because I
know that I personally love seafood. Our source of seafood, if these creatures
were to go extinct would be very scarce.
I
thought that this article was a pretty good one because everything was backed
up by some means of evidence. The only thing that I’m a little confused about is
that fact that global warming has been a known conflict problem in the past.
Why is it that scientists are only realizing this now? Deep-sea life has
probably endured many dramatic climate changes in the past, so why would they
be affected now? The climate has been drastically changing for a while, and
they have seemed to be fine until now. It would have been nice to know if the
population of deep-sea life has been decreasing in the past decade or not.
Other than that, I think this article has provided lots of good information
that is very useful and alarming.
A lot of information was shared in this article, and I think Noor did a good job in compacting all that given information into just one paragraph. She picked out the really important provided facts and analysis, instead of just rewriting the entire thing. She pinpointed exactly what the article was focusing on, which made it clear to readers what the subject on hand was. I also thought her own analysis and thinking was very strong. She ends by asking why are scientist only taking the effect of rising temperatures on deep sea life now? Also, why do they give off the vibe that this kind of climate change is different than past dramatic changes in climate in Earth's history.
ReplyDeleteIn reading this article and review, I became interested in the very delicate balance between the benefits and disadvantages of rising sea temperatures. While it creates creatures with faster metabolism and more substantial size, increased temperatures also create a new need for a different approach to food intake. Deep-sea animals would need more efficient means of getting food to make up for their new diet. I also found it interesting that approximately only 1% of the food available at the surface reaches deep sea. So currently, all organisms down in the deep below are living off of only 1% of all available food in the sea. Pretty amazing.
One suggestion I have for this review was to proof-read. I found many spelling and grammatical errors.
The review by Noor Banihashem Ahmad of the article Deep Sea Life: Threatened by Global Warming, gives me insight to the main essence of the article. The facts on the topic that were not to heavy and did not make me feel over informed. Noor weaved them very well together so it made it a very interesting review to read. The cause and effect of the threats of global warming were very well portrayed, she said the causes, then the effects, which makes sense because it was sequential and was easy to follow. A third feature of Noor’s review that was impressive were the questions in the end of her review. They showed she was thinking deeper into the topic than the article was talking about and that she could make a reflection on the article where she shared her personal thought and inquiries with the class.
ReplyDeleteThe topic of the article really drew me in me as much as how she appealing she made it from the way it was portrayed in the review. A couple interesting facts from her review of the article were, animals on the bottom of the ocean only receive about one percent of the food that is at the surface. Also, the fact that scientist can test sea life for metabolic rate, lifespan, growth, biomass, and size is extremely fascinating. Also, bringing up the point that if some certain sea-life go extinct it could wipe out other animals and creatures that make a more visible difference to us, which would definitely stir up more people learning about the problems of global warming on sea life, but otherwise it would not be good for the well being of our marine life.
This review expresses the facts well, the cause and effect of the problem, leaves us thinking, and points out good and bad parts of the article. I believe Noor did a very good job writing a reaction to the article, and I don’t believe she should change anything besides looking over her grammar and punctuation.
Sean Flanagan 10/1/12
ReplyDeleteCore Earth Science 1 Ms. Davies
I read Noor’s review of Deep Sea Life: Threatened by Global Warming. I liked it because she got to the point very quickly. It was succinct, and I didn’t have to look for the main point of the article. She also made me care about the sea life in the second paragraph. She didn’t just spit the information out. Noor made an effort to reach the reader and make me care. I also thought she made the information in the article very understandable to the reader. I was impressed because I find it very difficult to relay the information I read in articles to other people.
Noor taught me things about the ocean and the things that live in its extremes. For example, I didn’t know that sunlight doesn’t reach the bottom of the ocean floor. I had never really thought about it, but it seems like common sense that sunlight wouldn’t be able to penetrate that far. I also learned that the ocean heating up is affecting the life at the bottom of the ocean. Apparently, the warmer it gets, the more sustenance things like snails, brittle stars, sea pen, sea cucumber, and clams need to survive. The things we do with our carbon affects life as remote as the kind that lives at the bottom of the ocean.
Even though I enjoyed reading the review, there were some mistakes. Some of the punctuation and grammar of her review should be corrected. There were a few run-on sentences that made some points confusing and hard to follow. This could be fixed with punctuation like commas and periods. I enjoyed the review, but the punctuation and grammar should be improved.
Review by John George Brakatselos
Noor did a very good job in her review. She was able to really cover all the main points of the article in the review. Had I not read the article in advance I probably would have gotten all the same information by reading the review as well as gained Noor’s perspective on the things that are happening to deep sea life. She also organized and presented her analysis in a way that made sense. This was one of the things that made it very easy to understand and reader friendly. The review was also very thorough in terms of examples and specific details. The review left with no questions as to what the article had said. Every minor detail was included which also helped to improve your understanding of the information that the article is trying to convey.
What I thought was interesting from the article was the conditions in which this deep sea life has been living in. All this time there has been a living ecosystem in such difficult and unforgiving environments and yet they still live. I still wonder how with only 1% of surface food, all these creatures can survive. I also wonder about what Noor mentioned. Why has no action been taken yet to solve this huge issue. There are a lot of undersea lives that revolve around the survival of others for food. If the bottom of the chain dies off then extinction is inevitable for those higher up in the food chain.
In terms of improvements I would only recommend some minor editing.