Monday, November 3, 2014

Kevin Hendrick Current Event 1

Kevin Hendrick                      11/2/14
Earth Science D135          Mrs. McClellan

Storrs, Carina. "Fighting Poisons With Bacteria." The New York Times. The New York Times, 15 Sept. 2014. Web. 2 Nov. 2014.
“Fighting Poisons with Bacteria”- By Carina Storrs
The article, “Fighting Poisons with Bacteria”, by Carina Storrs describes scientists using microbes to try to reduce the amount of the harmful chemical arsenic in rice. Arsenic is commonly found in rice, and when one is often exposed to it there have
been links to heart disease, diabetes, and higher risks of cancer. Dr. Harsh Bais, a professor at Delaware University and other biologists found a bacteria, Pantoea Agglomerans, that may be the solution to this growing issue P. Agglomerans reduces the amount of a plant’s arsenic level to one-eighth of the original level when put in the rice plant’s micro biome. Agriculture companies are using bacteria on plants including corn and soybean to produce more fruit but use less fertilizer and endure disease or pests better. At the University of California, Venkatesan Sundaresan is conducting a thorough study of the rice micro biome and has discovered more than 250,000 bacteria is the micro biome. Dr. Bais and Dr. Sundaresan are collaborating, as Dr. Sundaresan sent samples of soil from his rice plants in his test field. Eleven different bacteria were isolated and Dr. Bais further tested the bacteria to see how they affected the growth of the rice plants. What is the breakthrough is that P. Agglomerans is the first bacteria known to reduce arsenic levels. This discovery is one small step in further reducing arsenic in rice; other strategies include breeding and genetic modification. Plant geneticist Shannon Pinson stated,”I would love the microbes to add to the genetic possibilities of water management and shortening the growing period.”(2)
This discovery has major implications for society because of how much rice our world consumes. Rice is a staple in the diets of many cultures and societies. Arsenic is very common in the soil of India of other Asian countries, where a majority of the world’s rice is produced. Therefore, if arsenic levels could be reduced to one-eighth of the original level, then that would vastly diminish the health risks of eating rice. The risk of heart disease, cancer, and diabetes would decrease immensely. On a personal level, I eat rice three of four times a week. This would be a major breakthrough for all people around the world, and this is only the first step to solving this issue.
This was a mostly well-written article by Carina Storrs, but I think it was written prematurely. I say this because there are still many questions that need answers in this particular field. The researchers of this bacteria still do not know how it being in the plant’s micro biome affects the growth of the rice. The scientists will have to wait until the next growing season to verify their theories. Also, the researchers do not know exactly how the arsenic-fighting bacterium works, although there are many theories about how arsenic is shielded from the plant’s micro biomes. Third, the scientists do not know whether the bacteria could survive in the competition of other soil bacteria in the micro biome. On the other hand, this article can be viewed as a good starting point to what seems to be a very promising study for these scientists, as more of the questions will be answered in the future. The author also did impressive research on this topic, interviewing different scientists and researchers as well as the complex information about plants’ micro biomes. Overall, the writer did a good job describing this topic and the implications it has on our society.


3 comments:

  1. Kevin Hendricks review of the article "Fighting Poisons with Bacteria"- by Carina Storrs was extremely well written and very informative. Just like Kevin I eat rice frequently and I am sure many others do as well, therefore he is definitely right in saying that solving this bacteria problem would be a major break through. I was not aware that high levels of arsenic were in rice, and that when arsenic is consumed it may cause heart disease, diabetes and high risks of various cancers. It is also very interesting that an alternative to using P. Agglomerates is to genetically modify the rice, and i am curious to how capable we are of doing so. Kevin did a phenomenal job explaining such a complex topic, he was able to make everything very easy to understand. That definitely made the read much nicer and enjoyable. He also did a great job finding quotes/sources, without those sources i may have doubted or questioned the ideas. However, I feel like he could have done a better job stating facts. A good idea would have been to include percentages and numbers to demonstrate how severe the arsenic in rice affects us. Overall, Kevin did a very good job explaining how we eliminate arsenic from rice and what it will take.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kevin Hendrick’s review of this article was very enjoyable to read. I really liked his summary of the article, because it was very succinct, but it also explained everything important in the article with enough evidence for the reader to understand it. For example he explains that scientists found out that rice has arsenic, which has been said to lead to terrible diseases, and also how different scientists found a bacteria that can reduce these harmful effects to the consumer. I also liked how Kevin included a quote from the article. Including quotes always gives another persons point of view, and also more more information on the topic. Lastly, I really liked Kevin’s critique paragraph. He criticized three specific things in the article, including the fact that there are too many unanswered questions involving the topic of this article, and that researchers do not know how the bacteria in the rice even works! He also added two other positive things he found in the article, which truly made the critique paragraph complete. In many other article reviews I have read recently, the authors forget to include specific positive things in the critique paragraph, but Kevin included both, which was excellent.
    Although this was a great article, there were a few things that went wrong. First of all, Kevin forget to separate his summary paragraph from his relevance paragraph, and made the paragraph much too long. But it also resulted in one paragraph with two different ideas in it, where it was hard to determine the end of the summary paragraph and the beginning of the relevance paragraph. This could have ended up confusing the reader. Kevin also did not include many facts about the rice and the diseases coming from it. For example, he could have included the probability of someone getting a disease from the rice.
    Overall, I really liked this Kevin’s review, and I learned a lot of interesting facts. I learned that rice can give you terrible diseases such as diabetes or cancer, but that scientists have found a way to stop, or at least hinder the harmful effects of the arsenic in rice. This is really great that people who have been getting ill from rice can be helped with this newly found, possibly helpful bacteria. In general, this was a great review and I enjoyed reading it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that Kevin's review on the article "Fighting Poisons with Bacteria" was very well written and informed myself and probably a lot of others on the danger of the high levels of arsenic in rice. Kevin explained the main ideas of the article and added some side notes as well. Along with that, Kevin did a great job of including detail, especially with who the researchers were. Also, I enjoyed how Kevin made a connection to how he eats rice very frequently, and how it could be dangerous if the consumption rate is too high. I was able to enjoy this review of the article because of set up of Kevin's review, and how he introduced each new idea. Kevin also added a few very important critiques on the article and how it is a little premature. Kevin was able to back up all of his critiques with valid reasons and good points. Overall, Kevin did a great job on his review, and made it an interesting read. It would be great if he could do a follow up article on this too.

    ReplyDelete