Jasmine Diaz June
6, 2013
Earth Science (C-Even) Ms.
Davies
Superstorm Sandy Shook the U.S., Literally
"Superstorm
Sandy Shook the U.S., Literally." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 18 Apr.
2013. Web. 06 June 2013.
<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130418213919.htm>.
Although
Hurricane Sandy seemed like just another natural disaster, something about it
was unlike many others. Sandy rattled many parts of New York City and Long
Island, but it didn’t end there. At the University of Utah, researchers found
that as the ocean waves hit each other and the shore, they also shook a large
percentage of the United States. Keith Koper, director of the University of
Utah Seismograph Stations, says he detected seismic waves, which were created
by the oceans waves hitting both the East Coast and smashing into each other. Oner
Sufri, a University of Utah geology and geophysics doctoral student and first
author of the study with Koper, says they were able to track the hurricane by
looking at the microseisms, which are relatively small seismic waves, which
were generated by Sandy. Although there is no magnitude for microseisms, Koper
predicts they range from about 2 to 3 on an earthquake magnitude scale. The
microseisms generated by Sandy were detected by Earthscope. Earthscope is a
National Science Foundation-funded array of about 500 portable seismometers,
which have been recently moving east. The purpose of Earthscope is to use
seismic waves from the earthquakes and other sources to make images of Earth's
crust and upper mantle beneath North America. Earthscope picked up the seismic
waves from the ocean waves collision, which led us to believe that Sandy shook
the U.S. Seismologists can track Hurricane Sandy and other natural disasters
because seismometers detect three components of motion, which include one
vertical and two horizontal. Koper says, "If you have enough seismometers,
you can get enough data to get arrows to point at the source." Basically
Koper is saying that the seismologists didn't track Sandy in real time, but the
seismographic data of the storm suggests it might be possible to help track
storms in the future using their seismicity.
I
chose this article because it relates seismic waves and hurricanes, which we just,
finished covering in class. Although, in class we only learned about how
seismic waves relate to earthquakes. Meanwhile, this article relates them to
hurricanes also. This is important to society because when people hear about
seismic waves they automatically assume an earthquake, but in this sense, it
was about a hurricane. This article taught me that seismic waves can be created
by a range of causes, and that earthquakes are not the only things that
generate seismic waves.
This
article was very fluent and easy to read, which made the article enjoyable. I also
enjoyed how the article was put into three subtopics, because it made it easier
to follow along. Lastly, I enjoyed how they gave a lot of information about
seismic waves, seismograph, seismologists, and microseisms. Although the
article was easy to read and informative, there were things that were choppy
and unclear. To make it better, for example, they could’ve elaborated on what
causes seismic waves, besides earthquakes. Also, I felt they could’ve explained
Earthscope in an easier way, that wasn’t as choppy. Other than that, I felt the
article was well written and understandable.
Jasmine, I think that you did an excellent job on this summary. I really enjoyed reading about this article because it is about two main topics that directly relate to our life: Hurricane Sandy, and the earthquake knowledge that Earth Science taught us. I think you did a really good job summarizing this information, and relating it to our life. I also think you did an excellent job critiquing the article and pointing to specific points that could have been improved. Additionally, you did a great job incorporating specific details into your summary that we have learned this year and making sure that it would be understood. I had no idea that seismic waves could be created by hurricanes, and was really interested to learn about this. I also thought it was really cool that we are trying to map the ocean floor beneath North America! I didn't know you could do that, but I think it would be really cool if we could figure out how to! Although this summary could have been improved by avoiding repetition and revising some punctuation errors, I think you did a great job!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your summary of this Earth Science article. You did a lot of things well here. First, I love the topic. Super storm Sandy was all too real for this area and even though it happened six months ago we are still experiencing the aftermath. So I commend you for picking such a good topic. I think you also did a great job summarizing the article and picking out the key details. It allowed me as the reader to get the gist of the article quickly. I also think you did a great job explaining what the article was discussing. I am sure this article talked about complicated ideas and you did a very nice job breaking them down and giving them to the reader in a very easy to understand way. You used your knowledge that you learned from class in doing this which I think is great. I learned one huge bit of information from your summary and that is how seismic waves can be used to track hurricanes. If this is the case, think about how many lives could be saved and property moved. I think that its fantastic. Also, I learned that waves caused by storms the size of Sandy on the East Coast can be so large that they register on seismic graphs in Utah! That is just unbelievable. No wonder so much damage was caused by these waves. One piece of advice was to avoid being repetitive when discussing your information. The reader becomes confused when details are repeated too much but other than that you did a great job.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete