Sunday, June 9, 2013

Superstorm Sandy Shook the U.S., Literally


Jasmine Diaz                                                                                       June 6, 2013
Earth Science (C-Even)                                                                       Ms. Davies

Superstorm Sandy Shook the U.S., Literally

"Superstorm Sandy Shook the U.S., Literally." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 18 Apr. 2013. Web. 06 June 2013. <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130418213919.htm>.

            Although Hurricane Sandy seemed like just another natural disaster, something about it was unlike many others. Sandy rattled many parts of New York City and Long Island, but it didn’t end there. At the University of Utah, researchers found that as the ocean waves hit each other and the shore, they also shook a large percentage of the United States. Keith Koper, director of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations, says he detected seismic waves, which were created by the oceans waves hitting both the East Coast and smashing into each other. Oner Sufri, a University of Utah geology and geophysics doctoral student and first author of the study with Koper, says they were able to track the hurricane by looking at the microseisms, which are relatively small seismic waves, which were generated by Sandy. Although there is no magnitude for microseisms, Koper predicts they range from about 2 to 3 on an earthquake magnitude scale. The microseisms generated by Sandy were detected by Earthscope. Earthscope is a National Science Foundation-funded array of about 500 portable seismometers, which have been recently moving east. The purpose of Earthscope is to use seismic waves from the earthquakes and other sources to make images of Earth's crust and upper mantle beneath North America. Earthscope picked up the seismic waves from the ocean waves collision, which led us to believe that Sandy shook the U.S. Seismologists can track Hurricane Sandy and other natural disasters because seismometers detect three components of motion, which include one vertical and two horizontal. Koper says, "If you have enough seismometers, you can get enough data to get arrows to point at the source." Basically Koper is saying that the seismologists didn't track Sandy in real time, but the seismographic data of the storm suggests it might be possible to help track storms in the future using their seismicity.
            I chose this article because it relates seismic waves and hurricanes, which we just, finished covering in class. Although, in class we only learned about how seismic waves relate to earthquakes. Meanwhile, this article relates them to hurricanes also. This is important to society because when people hear about seismic waves they automatically assume an earthquake, but in this sense, it was about a hurricane. This article taught me that seismic waves can be created by a range of causes, and that earthquakes are not the only things that generate seismic waves.
            This article was very fluent and easy to read, which made the article enjoyable. I also enjoyed how the article was put into three subtopics, because it made it easier to follow along. Lastly, I enjoyed how they gave a lot of information about seismic waves, seismograph, seismologists, and microseisms. Although the article was easy to read and informative, there were things that were choppy and unclear. To make it better, for example, they could’ve elaborated on what causes seismic waves, besides earthquakes. Also, I felt they could’ve explained Earthscope in an easier way, that wasn’t as choppy. Other than that, I felt the article was well written and understandable.

3 comments:

  1. Jasmine, I think that you did an excellent job on this summary. I really enjoyed reading about this article because it is about two main topics that directly relate to our life: Hurricane Sandy, and the earthquake knowledge that Earth Science taught us. I think you did a really good job summarizing this information, and relating it to our life. I also think you did an excellent job critiquing the article and pointing to specific points that could have been improved. Additionally, you did a great job incorporating specific details into your summary that we have learned this year and making sure that it would be understood. I had no idea that seismic waves could be created by hurricanes, and was really interested to learn about this. I also thought it was really cool that we are trying to map the ocean floor beneath North America! I didn't know you could do that, but I think it would be really cool if we could figure out how to! Although this summary could have been improved by avoiding repetition and revising some punctuation errors, I think you did a great job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really enjoyed reading your summary of this Earth Science article. You did a lot of things well here. First, I love the topic. Super storm Sandy was all too real for this area and even though it happened six months ago we are still experiencing the aftermath. So I commend you for picking such a good topic. I think you also did a great job summarizing the article and picking out the key details. It allowed me as the reader to get the gist of the article quickly. I also think you did a great job explaining what the article was discussing. I am sure this article talked about complicated ideas and you did a very nice job breaking them down and giving them to the reader in a very easy to understand way. You used your knowledge that you learned from class in doing this which I think is great. I learned one huge bit of information from your summary and that is how seismic waves can be used to track hurricanes. If this is the case, think about how many lives could be saved and property moved. I think that its fantastic. Also, I learned that waves caused by storms the size of Sandy on the East Coast can be so large that they register on seismic graphs in Utah! That is just unbelievable. No wonder so much damage was caused by these waves. One piece of advice was to avoid being repetitive when discussing your information. The reader becomes confused when details are repeated too much but other than that you did a great job.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete