Jasmine Diaz June
6, 2013
Earth Science (C-Even) Ms.
Davies
Superstorm Sandy Shook the U.S., Literally
"Superstorm
Sandy Shook the U.S., Literally." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 18 Apr.
2013. Web. 06 June 2013.
<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130418213919.htm>.
Although
Hurricane Sandy seemed like just another natural disaster, something about it
was unlike many others. Sandy rattled many parts of New York City and Long
Island, but it didn’t end there. At the University of Utah, researchers found
that as the ocean waves hit each other and the shore, they also shook a large
percentage of the United States. Keith Koper, director of the University of
Utah Seismograph Stations, says he detected seismic waves, which were created
by the oceans waves hitting both the East Coast and smashing into each other. Oner
Sufri, a University of Utah geology and geophysics doctoral student and first
author of the study with Koper, says they were able to track the hurricane by
looking at the microseisms, which are relatively small seismic waves, which
were generated by Sandy. Although there is no magnitude for microseisms, Koper
predicts they range from about 2 to 3 on an earthquake magnitude scale. The
microseisms generated by Sandy were detected by Earthscope. Earthscope is a
National Science Foundation-funded array of about 500 portable seismometers,
which have been recently moving east. The purpose of Earthscope is to use
seismic waves from the earthquakes and other sources to make images of Earth's
crust and upper mantle beneath North America. Earthscope picked up the seismic
waves from the ocean waves collision, which led us to believe that Sandy shook
the U.S. Seismologists can track Hurricane Sandy and other natural disasters
because seismometers detect three components of motion, which include one
vertical and two horizontal. Koper says, "If you have enough seismometers,
you can get enough data to get arrows to point at the source." Basically
Koper is saying that the seismologists didn't track Sandy in real time, but the
seismographic data of the storm suggests it might be possible to help track
storms in the future using their seismicity.
I
chose this article because it relates seismic waves and hurricanes, which we just,
finished covering in class. Although, in class we only learned about how
seismic waves relate to earthquakes. Meanwhile, this article relates them to
hurricanes also. This is important to society because when people hear about
seismic waves they automatically assume an earthquake, but in this sense, it
was about a hurricane. This article taught me that seismic waves can be created
by a range of causes, and that earthquakes are not the only things that
generate seismic waves.
This
article was very fluent and easy to read, which made the article enjoyable. I also
enjoyed how the article was put into three subtopics, because it made it easier
to follow along. Lastly, I enjoyed how they gave a lot of information about
seismic waves, seismograph, seismologists, and microseisms. Although the
article was easy to read and informative, there were things that were choppy
and unclear. To make it better, for example, they could’ve elaborated on what
causes seismic waves, besides earthquakes. Also, I felt they could’ve explained
Earthscope in an easier way, that wasn’t as choppy. Other than that, I felt the
article was well written and understandable.