Steven Ircha 4/7/2013
Ms. Davies
Core Earth Science C Even
McDonough, William, and
Michael Braungart. "Can Soil Replace Oil as a Source of Energy? [Excerpt]:
Scientific American." Can Soil Replace Oil as a
Source of Energy? [Excerpt]: Scientific American. Scientific American, 4 Apr. 2013. Web. 07 Apr.
2013.
This article
discusses the future of the world’s energy crisis. The author defines what
energy is, and a battery is not merely some device that holds electricity, but
a unit that is capable of storing potential of an electromagnetic reaction.
Once this definition changes, suddenly many more options for the future of
acquiring this energy broadens. The author states that fossil fuels, which are
what the world derives most of its energy off of today, are simply ancient
organic compounds. Now using this same logic, there are many sources of fuel
that exist on our planet today. Soil is in fact one of these resources. But it
is not as common as one might think, and fertile soil is degrading at an even
faster level. Nutrients such as carbon are sucked out by plants and the soil
loses its value and ability to grow and sustain life. Phosphate and carbon need
to be reintroduced into the ground and once these elements are back into the
Earth, the ground again can continue to grow plentiful harvests. This simple
solution of enriching the soil will help to produce more crops in the long run
and keep the people with a stable food supply. From soil, the world produces
one of the world’s most valuable resource, food. Composting is steps in the correct direction,
but can only advance soil reproduction so far. Waste reuse or “nutrient
management” is the brightest alternative the world has right now. Traditionally,
waste has been treated and ultimately dumped. This is an expensive process
which uses chemicals and pollutes water. Nations such as the Netherlands are
activists in the green movement. They have set up many waste treatment plants
across their country and use it in two valuable ways. They extract the
phosphorus and nitrogen, two of the most valuable resources in soil that allow
for growth and they deposit it back into their topsoil. They then take the
remaining waste and extract methane, a valuable gas that can be processed to
fuel a number of things. Geoff Lawton, an Australian scientist has recently
discovered a way to desalinate fields. Salt is deadly to crops as it destroys
the nutrient levels of fields. By digging small irrigation ditches through a
field, rainwater can be trapped. It then absorbs into the soil and can make an
unusable field able to grow again. Besides food use as a fuel production to
produce and use methane, there are other ways to participate in this revolution
including incorporating multi-level greenhouses into cities and towns to
maximize space for growing and decreasing the need for shipping. The article proposes
that more and more greenhouses need to be built and the soil maintained, thus
creating a cycle. Plants and grown, then eaten by humans who produce waste,
then the waste is converted into energy through methane, or natural gas, and the
remainder is used to keep the topsoil fertile while excess energy is used to
keep greenhouses running. While a perfect system is still far away, progress is
being made daily and the world’s companies and people are becoming more aware
of the energy system and the simply ways we can avoid problems for the future.
This article
is not only extremely relevant and important for the world today, but for all
of the future. If what this article suggests can be properly followed not only
will the world solve its problem of degrading topsoil and food shortages, but
it will also bring an abundance of energy. This is so important as currently scientists
are searching desperately for a new sustainable source of energy when for
centuries we have been disposing of the simplest ways of creating it. If the
world ever fully adopts this system, who knows what will be possible. World
hunger will be solved, as food is not only abundant but necessary to be used in
order to feed more people to create more usable energy. Once this is properly
executed, many of the conflicts of the world will have no reason to continue as
their main reason will have completely vanished. The societal changes in a
world where food, soil, and energy are basically unlimited and perfectly
sustainable are unfathomable. At that point the progresses that are possible
are limitless, and the world will not have to worry about ever running out of
such things as they have created the perfect system. At this point, many other
more pertinent issues can be addressed and solved making the world an overall
better place to live.
While this article suggested a sustainable future that would
change the world, the plan did have a few hitches. Mainly these came by the way
of money and education. The ideas presented here are interesting and well
thought out but planning on paper can only bring us so far. For the plan to
actually work the way that authors intend it to a lot more than an attitude change
is necessary. A lot of money is needed to create these systems of crop
management, resource management, and the transportation of all of the
resources. Also who will fund this massive project, because as a result of this
immediate change many of the world largest companies would fail sending the
world into another recession? The government surely could not fund this
operation for the same reason. Also the logistical concerns are enormous. How
will resources be transported, where will these greenhouses be, who will own
this operation? These are all questions that need to be answered in order for
these authors to make a case. They have a great idea, but need to discuss its implementations
on a scale level, and actually attempt to make a miniature version of this
system. Only once they have done this can they begin to present their case and
start moving towards their end goal on a large scale. Besides those major
flaws, these authors have created an in depth and seemingly possible program
for a sustainable future. Only time will tell whether this goal will actually
be reached!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI thought that Steven did a great job overall summarizing and analyzing this article. The world’s energy supply is a very serious topic that is constantly being looked at in new ways and Steven managed to highlight one of these techniques and explain its success in a very effective manner. He does a great job organizing his thoughts so that the review runs smoothly. He started by stating the current problem and then transitioning into why and how the use of soil could help during and energy crisis once the world runs out of the current fossil fuels we are using now. Steven did a good job explaining exactly what is done to the soil to help it grow more. He explained is detail yet in a way that wasn’t to complex to understand how certain chemicals are taken from soil and deposited back in topsoil so it can be reused again for growth. Another aspect of his review that was well presented was his last paragraph that critiques the article. Steven looked passed what was given and asked more questions. He found faults in the author’s points of view by stating real concerns that many people would not think of. The last paragraph really shows that a lot of thought was gone into reading this article and that Steven was capable of asking more. From reading this review I learned a lot about soil. I have never considered that soil is degrading. It is so common in my life I was very surprised to find out that in order to get enough soil to plant enough food to feed everyone on the planet we would have to take chemicals form garbage and put it into top soil. The ideas presented in the article are amazing and it seems unreal that they would actually work. I also found it interesting that this idea is not more wide spread. I always here about famines around the world and how the population is rising so quickly that we soon will not have enough food to sustain everyone. This concept is new to me and it makes a lot of sense. Steven mentioned the money shortage to make such a project possible. It surprises me that this idea is not more known and that more people are not pushing for it to happen. In general, this review was excellent. If I had to make one improvement it would be to talk more about how food would be able to be brought to other countries. With all of the soil we could grow more but where would it go? It would have been nice if this question was addressed but overall this was a great review that had a very nice flow.
ReplyDelete